Cases 31 - 40 of 680
Allah-U-Akbar v. Ashtabula County et al
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Malik Allah-U-Akbar and Odraye Jones
Defendant:
Ashtabula County, City of Ashtabula, Ashtabula County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kroy LLC
as 1:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
Kroy LLC doing business as Buckeye Business Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mauer v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Mauer
Defendant:
Norman Jacobs and Hope L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Pluff et al
as 3:2023cv01492
Plaintiff:
Oshae Jones
Defendant:
Ashlyn Pluff, Samantha Kill, City of Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meinke et al v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Nolan P. Meinke and Jose Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Philip R. Stammitti, Captain Hammond Jack, Administrator James Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Janet Renee Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
