Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Pierce v. United States of America et al
as 4:2013cv02625
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alexander Pierce
Defendant:
United States of America and M. W. Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Pierce et al v. Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv02001
Plaintiff:
Michael S Pierce , Billie Jeanine Cameron , Tracy D Stradford and others
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Police Department , Scott Mielke, C. J. Frey and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
United States of America
3rd_party_plaintiff:
City of Brooklyn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Pierce v. Dietz et al
as 4:2013cv01956
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alexander Pierce
Defendant:
Wayne Dietz and John Doe Lieutenant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01744
Plaintiff:
Kami L Pierce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pierce v. Bunting
as 1:2012cv02561
Petitioner:
Marcus Pierce
Respondent:
Jason Bunting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2012dp21352
Plaintiff:
Judith Diane Pierce
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rotsky v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
as 1:2011cv02111
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Rotsky
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
DePascal et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22047
Plaintiff:
Brandon DePascal , Hilda DePascal , Emma Gross and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Pritchard et al
as 1:2011cv01575
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Walter H. Pritchard, Jr. , Lawrence E. Pritchard, Diana Paolitto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
