Cases 41 - 50 of 3,601
Wolfe v. USA
as 1:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Bryan Shane Wolfe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Collum v. USA
as 5:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Terry M. Collum
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sheridan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Brandon L. Sheridan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Luster v. USA
as 5:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Vernon M. Luster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Windham v. USA
as 5:2024cv00320
Petitioner:
Seth Windham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. $9,930.00 in U.S. Currency, et al.
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,930.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Rosa Ceja, Adriana Jones and Howard Miller
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Soto v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jesse Soto
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. USA
as 5:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Elmer Curtis Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Milliron v. USA
as 3:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
William B. Milliron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gulley v. Howell et al.
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jesse-James Gulley, Jr.
Defendant:
Aaron P. Howell, James S. Gwin, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
