Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Holmes v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22914
Plaintiff:
Deloris Holmes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22864
Plaintiff:
Robert Holmes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22074
Plaintiff:
Mittie Holmes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v DePuy Othopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2012dp20216
Plaintiff:
Terry Holmes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 1:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
Terry Holmes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2011cv02656
Plaintiff:
Mildred Holmes
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Troyer v. Hershberger et al
as 5:2011cv02536
Plaintiff:
Clara Troyer
Defendant:
Fred Hershberger, Dwain Schlabach, Holmes County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Holmes et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2011dp22557
Plaintiff:
Theresa Holmes and Daniel Holmes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited , DePuy Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22067
Plaintiff:
George Holmes
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christensen v. Wiseman et al
as 1:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Christensen
Defendant:
Russell B. Wiseman, Steven Eckstein, Shane M. Leuthold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
