Cases 81 - 90 of 177
Reed v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 4:2016cv01207
Petitioner:
Douglas Reed
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal, DSCC Director and Warden FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Usher v. Chief US Marshal Illinois et al
as 4:2016cv01138
Petitioner:
Mathew Usher
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal Illinois, Chief US Marshal Alabama, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tetter v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 4:2016cv01140
Plaintiff:
David Tetter
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Steven Merlack and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Osborne v. Chief U.S. Marshal, et al
as 4:2016cv00947
Petitioner:
Ajamu S Osborne
Respondent:
US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sinkfield v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2016cv00948
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Woodson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Allen Woodson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, U.S. Marshalls Office and St. Elizabeth Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IUE-CWA, et al v. General Electric Company
as 4:2015cv02301
Plaintiff:
IUE-CWA, , IUE-CWA GE and Aerospace Conference Board , United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Picone v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2015cv02047
Plaintiff:
Adam Picone
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Northeast Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Picone v. United States Marshal Service, et al.
as 4:2015cv02033
Plaintiff:
Adam Picone
Defendant:
Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
