Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Dyson v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Randy Dyson
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio, Jason Mize, Jerome Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ealy v. Rice, et al
as 3:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Ealy
Defendant:
Walter H. Rice, Michael R. Merz, Thomas Rose and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Amos v. McCathren et al
as 1:2007cv01030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Amos and Christopher Amos
Defendant:
Garold McCathren, James Seth, Miranda Seth and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ealy v. Ruppert et al
as 3:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Larry E Ealy
Defendant:
James E. Ruppert, Addie Jane King, Steve Hieber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Floyd v. Lyman et al
as 2:2008cv01029
Plaintiff:
Norma Jean Floyd
Defendant:
Bob (Robert) Lyman, John D. Shupe, Elizabeth Grime and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. City of Dayton, Ohio et al
as 3:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Ohio, Anita M. Hauser, Maurice Louderback and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wingert v. McCathren et al
as 1:2007cv01031
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wingert and Antonio Wingert
Defendant:
Garold McCathren, James Seth, Miranda Seth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MSI Regency Ltd. v. Jackson et al
as 1:2007cv00900
Plaintiff:
MSI Regency Ltd.
Defendant:
Alvin D. Jackson, J Nick Baird, Christine A. Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayner v. Frost et al
as 2:2007cv01097
Plaintiff:
Tina L. Hayner
Defendant:
Gregory L. Frost and Norah McCann-King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Delagrange v. Zelman et al
as 2:2007cv00387
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Delagrange
Defendant:
Susan Zelman, Pamela King and Todd Barnhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
