Cases 51 - 60 of 375
Jackson v. R&R Tool, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson
Defendant:
R&R Tool, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Fisher v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01952
Plaintiff:
Latoya Fisher
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Carmen Webb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Tomello v. Syneos Health Communication, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01587
Plaintiff:
Derek Tomello
Defendant:
Syneos Health Communication, Inc. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Class v. Kenwood Dealer Group Inc et al
as 1:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Brian Class
Defendant:
Kenwood Dealer Group Inc, Subaru of Beechmont, Inc. and Kenwood Dealer Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis v. R+L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv00671
Plaintiff:
Summer Davis
Defendant:
R+L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hanna v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03889
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hanna
Defendant:
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. and Kevin Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Robert M Kincaid
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Zehring v. Altercare Newark South, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05881
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Zehring
Defendant:
Altercare Newark South, Inc., Lacey Jones and Crystal Torrence
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Rollins v. Safelite Solutions, LLC
as 2:2021cv05805
Plaintiff:
Dreidre Rollins
Defendant:
Safelite Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Whitmore v. AEP Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv05747
Plaintiff:
Robert Whitmore
Defendant:
AEP Ohio and Andrea Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Stanford et al
as 2:2021cv05827
Plaintiff:
Jessica Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. John Stanford and Dr. Sheryl Stevens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
