Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Kanzigg et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Counter Defendant:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Kanzigg, Ricki Frederica Fulton, Michael J. Kirk (Remainderman) and others
Counter Claimant:
North American Coal Royalty Company, Paul E. Holiday, Jr., Capstone Holding Company and others
Interested Party:
Tom Horner, Gerald Frank Hinkle, Craig Paynter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Rose v. Bersa et al
as 1:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Brittany Rose
Defendant:
Bersa, Eagle Imports and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rover Pipeline LLC v. 5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000 et al
as 2:2017oe00108
Defendant:
5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000, Ruth Anne Kanzig, Ricki Frederica Fulton and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Bruzzese, Jr. et al v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLC
as 2:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Bruzzese, Jr. and Lisa A. Bruzzese
Defendant:
Chesapeake Exploration, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Chesapeake Exploration, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Joseph J. Bruzzese, Jr. , Lisa A. Bruzzese , Elizabeth Albery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
Terry Martin, Terry Martin, Della Grooms and others
Defendant:
Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC, Chrysler Motor LLC and Chrysler Motor LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tignor v. Marquez
as 1:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Rose Tignor
Defendant:
Greg Marquez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Prater et al
as 2:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Rose Merry Prater, Unknown Spouse of Rose Merry Prater and City Loan Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
