Cases 11 - 20 of 256
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Layne v. Thouroughman et al
as 1:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
James W. Layne, IV
Defendant:
David Thouroughman, Ron Davis, Jodi Conkle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mills v. Cvitkovich et al
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Craig Mills
Defendant:
Matthew Cvitkovich, Chief Chris Stutes, Sheriff Scott Anger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Knight et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
William Knight, Eric Smith, Mark Coleman and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hunt et al v. City of Nelsonville Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hunt and Ashley Klinedinst
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville Ohio, Scott Frank, Scott Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
