Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Murphy v. City of Jackson et al
as 2:2007cv00959
Plaintiff:
Tonya S Murphy, Tonya S Murphy, Tonya S Murphy and others
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Zack Taylor, Scott Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Ohio's Secretary of State et al
as 2:2007cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jomo Williams, J.K.M.W. Committee and Government Of Divination National Committee
Defendant:
Ohio's Secretary of State and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Schilling et al v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2007cv00535
Plaintiff:
Gordon Schilling and John and Jane Doe's
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Columbus Chief of Police and John and Jane Doe's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leisure v. The City of Reynoldsburg, Ohio et al
as 2:2007cv00411
Plaintiff:
Linda Leisure
Defendant:
The City of Reynoldsburg, Ohio, Robert McPherson, James E. Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McMullen et al v. City of Cincinnati
as 1:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jane McMullen, Jane McMullen, Jane McMullen and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Setty v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Donald Setty, Donald Setty, Donald Setty and others
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Inc., Southern Health Partners, Inc., George M Kaiser, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglass et al v. Shaw et al
as 2:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Christine Douglass, Christine Douglass, John J. Douglass, IV and others
Defendant:
Traci M. Shaw, Police Chief James G. Jackson, Columbus Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
