Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hmoud, et al v. City Of Cincinnati, et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
ahmad hmoud and Liberty Used Tires, LLC
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Emily Smart Woerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Owens et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv04555
Plaintiff:
Joseph Reed and Latasha Owens
Defendant:
Jody Upton, Correctional Officer Reamy, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Miller v. The City of Springfield Police Division et al
as 3:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Michelle Pamer, John Doe, The Springfield Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasscock v. Mt. Orab Village of et al
as 1:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
John R. Glasscock
Defendant:
Mt. Orab Village of, George Baker, Ryan Gergory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
