Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Weaver v. Doerflien et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mykell Weaver
Defendant:
Lt Dean Doerflien, Sgt William Hane, P.O. Andrew Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Damschroder et al
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michelle Morris
Defendant:
Matt Damschroder, Margie Weaver, Abigail Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
More v. Weaver et al
as 2:2023cv03086
Plaintiff:
John E More, Jr
Defendant:
Joshua Alan Weaver and The Village of Roseville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink and Diann Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023oe00420
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyons et al v. Jacobs et al
as 2:2021cv00940
Defendant:
Kimberley Jacobs, Commander Gary Cameron, Lieutenant Wade Spears and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Randall Lyons, Sergeant Douglas Jones and Officer Anthony Johnson
Not Classified By Court:
Matthew D Besser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2018cv01142
Defendant:
Mark Gramlich and City of Columbus
Plaintiff:
bryan scott weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018oe01141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
