Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Day et al
as 2:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Diane Johnson
Defendant:
Donnie Day, Morgan Styles, Cole Piatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aniyunwiya v. Kalis et al
as 2:2022cv02568
Plaintiff:
Achak Ben Aniyunwiya
Defendant:
Judge Maria Kalis, Gregory Starcher, Greg Starcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aniyunwiya v. Lutz et al
as 2:2022cv02325
Plaintiff:
Achak Ben Aniyunwiya
Defendant:
Matthew Lutz, Brice Swiney, Mark C Fleegle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galluzzo v. Warden, Tri-County Regional Jail
as 3:2019cv00171
Petitioner:
Michael A Galluzzo
Defendant:
Warden, Tri-County Regional Jail
Respondent:
Scott Springhetti
Interested Party:
Ben Hoskinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fears v. Edens et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
William Fears
Defendant:
Brian Edens, Doug Ferrell, Jennifer Setters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fannon v. Patterson et al
as 3:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Chistian P Fannon
Defendant:
Don Patterson, Ben Charles, Doug Kowalski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Mohr et al
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Robert L Martin
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Timothy Brunsman, Shay Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Wilkinson et al
as 2:2010cv00917
Plaintiff:
John Miller, Darryl Blankenship, Roy Slider and others
Defendant:
Reginald A Wilkinson, David Schwartz, Terry Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Warden Corrections Medical Center
as 1:2010cv00551
Petitioner:
Ben Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden Corrections Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolfel v. Gilliam et al
as 2:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Wolfel
Defendant:
Ben Gilliam, Inmate #1, Inmate #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
