Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Barfield v. Hayes et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Zachary Barfield
Defendant:
C/O Hayes and C/O Gaffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Hayes et al
as 2:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
James Williams, IV and James Williams, IV, r
Defendant:
David Hayes, Suzzane Schmidt, Michelle Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Buckwalter et al
as 3:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
James W.D. Williams, IV
Defendant:
Judge Michael Buckwalter, David Hayes, Michelle Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hayes et al
as 2:2022cv03383
Plaintiff:
James W.D. Williams, IV
Defendant:
David Hayes, Michelle Haney and Sgt. Amatos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Tornichio et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Pierre Rahsaan Taylor
Defendant:
Adolfo Tornichio, Stephen Wolaver, Alan Kraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayes v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 3:2018cv00055
Petitioner:
Ryan M. Hayes
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Lawless et al.
as 2:2017cv01057
Plaintiff:
Arnold R Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Jeff Lawless, William Winters, Jonathan Spoljarik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
