Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Maye v. Eiden et al
as 2:2022cv04249
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Kitchen et al
as 2:2019cv04166
Defendant:
Tom Beckner, Deputy Chad Kerns, Daulton Lowry and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heid et al v. Mohr et al
as 2:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Heid and James E. Damron
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Roger Wilson, Trevor Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 3:2018cv00105
Petitioner:
Alex C Norris
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris v. Bunting
as 2:2015cv00764
Petitioner:
Derrick Cameron Norris
Respondent:
Jason Bunting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 3:2011cv00204
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Norris
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
as 1:2010cv00764
Petitioner:
William E. Norris
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norris v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2008cv00732
Petitioner:
Dowell Norris
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tyrvaldsen v. County of Fairfield Ohio et al
as 2:2008cv00220
Plaintiff:
Ymir-Jule Tyrvaldsen
Defendant:
County of Fairfield Ohio, Rachel Jane Tyrvaldsen, Martin Norris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
