Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hill v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Genesis Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv01275
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dante Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Warden/Captain Nick Fisher, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Butler County et al
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Estate of Cody Bohanan and Victoria Matthews
Defendant:
Butler County, Sheriff Richard K Jones, Medical Director Dr. Anthony Abdullah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Trooper Tyler S. Ross, Senior Trooper John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Champlin et al
as 2:2021cv04588
Plaintiff:
Admin Cara Gibson and Cara Gibson
Defendant:
Matt Champlin, Kevin T. Werry, Chief Deputy Troy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Standifer v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2019cv03803
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Travis Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Cameryn Standifer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Godfrey v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00663
Defendant:
Judge John (NMN) Williams, Dwayne R. Bowman, Commissioner Chris Monzel and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Morgan et al
as 1:2016cv00655
Plaintiff:
John C. Moore
Defendant:
Donald Morgan, Gary Mohr, Keith Fellure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
