Cases 11 - 20 of 81,739
Bridgewater v. Frederick
as 2:2024cv03224
Petitioner:
Dominique Bridgewater
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Loftis et al
as 3:2024mc00005
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
Leslie R Loftis and Kim D Loftis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quantum Health, Inc. v. PB Restaurants, LLC
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Quantum Health, Inc.
Defendant:
PB Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Henery v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03222
Plaintiff:
Derek Henery
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PENNINGTON- SMITH v. J.A.M.M. ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
CHEYENNE NICOLE PENNINGTON- SMITH
Defendant:
J.A.M.M. ENTERPRISES, LLC and MICHAEL HARDING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Findley et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 2:2024cv03220
Plaintiff:
James Findley and April Findley
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ohio Chamber of Commerce, Inc. et al v. Secretary of State of Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Ohio Chamber of Commerce, Inc. and Ohio Chamber of Commerce PAC
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Ohio, Attorney General of Ohio, Ohio Elections Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
