Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Holmes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00825
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Holmes
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Kelly Mulloy Myers, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Boggs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05404
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv01825
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01381
Plaintiff:
Bobby Boggs and Stephene Boggs
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klosterman v. Sedamsville Community Development Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Lonnie Wise, Patricia A. Burke, Mayor John Cranley and others
Plaintiff:
John Klosterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2019cv04369
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Russell Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv01044
Plaintiff:
Vicki E. Boggs
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dula v. Hamilton County Prosecutors Office et al
as 1:2018cv00620
Defendant:
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts, Brian Gilligan, Aftab Pureval and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Dula
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boggs et al v. Jai Shree Laxmi Hospitality LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00699
Plaintiff:
Courtney Boggs and Jason S Boggs
Defendant:
Jai Shree Laxmi Hospitality LLC and Bluestone Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs et al v. Jai Shree Laxmi Hospitality LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00480
Plaintiff:
Courtney Boggs and Jason S Boggs
Defendant:
Jai Shree Laxmi Hospitality LLC and Bluestone Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
