Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Johnson v. Burkes et al
as 2:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
Joyce Johnson
Defendant:
Ronette Burkes, M Sarah Corbett, Monalisa Lenya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Burkes et al
as 1:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Joyce Johnson
Defendant:
Ronette Burkes, M Sarah Corbett, Monalisa Lenya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Ervin et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Michael Ervin, Ronald Erdos and John and/or Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ballew v. Asbestos Workers Local #8 Retirement Trust Fund et al
as 1:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
Winston J Ballew
Defendant:
Asbestos Workers Local #8 Retirement Trust Fund , Stoner and Associates Inc, Board of Trustees of Asbestos Workers Union Local 8 Retirement Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Shaw v. City of Dayton et al
as 3:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Rachel Shaw
Defendant:
City of Dayton , Alex Magill and John and/or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Trapp v. Kimpel et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
William L Trapp
Defendant:
Dean Kimpel, James Stevenson, Ralph Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humes et al v. Blue Ash City of et al
as 1:2012cv00960
Plaintiff:
Jevon T. Humes and Ayisha R. Humes
Defendant:
Blue Ash City of , Chris Wallace , Robert Gerhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
