Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Layman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv02166
Plaintiff: D. Scott Layman
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Layman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00112
Plaintiff: Melissa Layman
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Layman v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00390
Plaintiff: Charles Layman
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Layman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01490
Plaintiff: Edward F. Layman
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Layman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00888
Plaintiff: Debra Kay Layman
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conley v. Lawrence County Ohio/Board of Lawrence County Commissioners et al
as 1:2013cv00891
Plaintiff: Julie Conley
Defendant: Lawrence County Ohio/Board of Lawrence County Commissioners, Jeffrey S. Lawless, Rodolfo Canos, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00778
Plaintiff: Keisha Bates
Defendant: Kevin O'Brien, Carrie Doppes Wolf, Jonathan M. Layman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jackson v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00768
Plaintiff: Keisha S Jackson
Defendant: Kevin J O'Brien, Carrie Doppes Wolfe, Jonathan M. Layman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harp v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00726
Plaintiff: Lynetta M Harp
Defendant: Kevin J. O'Brien, Carrie Doppes Wolfe, Jonathan M. Layman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duffy v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2013cv00725
Plaintiff: Ginger M. Duffy
Defendant: Kevin J. O'Brien, Carrie Doppes Wolfe, Jonathan M. Layman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?