Cases 11 - 20 of 447
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff:
Tamica S Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Roy Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Clarence Moore
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00978
Plaintiff:
Patricia Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Spencer Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Nathan Moore and Emily Moore
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00204
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
John Maurice Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
