Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nichols v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01350
Plaintiff:
Travis Nichols
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Carllynn Nichols
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nichols v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05384
Plaintiff:
Marsha Nichols
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beckerich et al v. Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Christy Beckerich, Meghan Bentle, Morgan Bishop and others
Defendant:
Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc., Summit Medical Group, Inc. d/b/a St. Elizabeth Physicians, Cincinnati Children Hospital Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
El-Bey et al v. Wallace et al
as 1:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Holland, Butler, L. Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Jhonali One Eye El-Bey and Nichole L. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Cadena v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02287
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nichole Cadena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bezio v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02131
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nichole Bezio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Garcia-Nichols v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01449
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Garcia-Nichols
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
