Cases 11 - 20 of 327
Peters v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Mel Peters
Defendant:
Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Peters v. Dayton-Phoenix Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Valerie Peters
Defendant:
Dayton-Phoenix Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Galen Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dirksen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Peter Jeremy Dirksen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bova v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Peter Bova
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03843
Plaintiff:
Wayne Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heatley v. Lapole et al
as 3:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEO HEATLEY
Defendant:
KIMBERLY LAPOLE and PETER HENDRICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Knight et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
William Knight, Eric Smith, Mark Coleman and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
