Cases 31 - 40 of 494
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verlander v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03740
Plaintiff:
Adam Verlander
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nitzel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03507
Plaintiff:
Adam Nitzel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Motley v. Dream Living LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03478
Plaintiff:
Phileisha Yuvette Motley
Defendant:
Dream Living LLC doing business as 10x Property, Gamal Harding, Amalea Harding and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Stephens v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Adam Stephens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03262
Plaintiff:
Sean Adams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GS Holistic, LLC v. Epic Puff LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03228
Plaintiff:
GS HOLISTIC, LLC
Defendant:
EPIC PUFF LLC, ADAM NAJI, HASSON SHARIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gonzales et al. v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Edward Gonzales, Kent Kilgore, Adam Plouse and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State Univesity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02949
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T Adams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02881
Plaintiff:
Adam Ford
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
