Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Cole v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03744
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joseph Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03216
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Gary Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02865
Defendant: Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ryan Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lilley-Coles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01371
Defendant: Davol, Inc, and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lottie Lilley-Coles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01214
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Steve Cole and Michelle Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole et al v. Coverstone et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00829
Defendant: John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Chris A. Coverstone and others
Plaintiff: Evan A. Cole and Edward J. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00535
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wendell Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. In Re: Dayol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2019cv00858
Defendant: In Re: Dayol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff: Ruby M. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Cole v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04030
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ryan L. Cole, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Atrium Medical Center et al
as 1:2019cv00711
Plaintiff: Sharon S. Foster
Defendant: Dr. Megan E. Cole, Dr. Michael Uhl, R.N. Cheryl A Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?