Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Hurst v. Robertson et al
as 2:2014cv02657
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Hurst
Defendant:
Christian Robertson, Richard Day and Jobes, Henderson Assoc., et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruff v. Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers & Industry International et al
as 2:2014cv00593
Plaintiff:
G. Thomas Ruff
Defendant:
Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers & Industry International , Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund Board of Trustees , Bakers Union Local #57 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Lott v. Pacer, et al.,
as 2:2013cv01181
Plaintiff:
Harry William Lott
Defendant:
Pacer, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devere Construction Company, Inc. v. A. Bonamase Contracting, Inc. et al.,
as 2:2013mc00004
Plaintiff:
Devere Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant:
A. Bonamase Contracting, Inc. et al.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al. v. Stotts Mechanical Insulation, Inc. et al.
as 2:2013mc00003
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al.
Defendant:
Stotts Mechanical Insulation, Inc. et al.
Nexlink Communication, LLC v. Glassburn, et al.,
as 2:2012mc00047
Plaintiff:
Nexlink Communication, LLC
Defendant:
Nick Glassburn, et al. and Tower Wireless, Ltd.
Triplett-Fazzone v. City of Columbus Division of Police, et al.,
as 2:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Ragna Triplett-Fazzone
Defendant:
City of Columbus Division of Police, et al., Franklin County Sheriff's Department, et al., The Sugar Bar, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, et al. v. Basso
as 2:2012mc00015
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, et al.
Defendant:
Edward Basso
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
