Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Dyson v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Randy Dyson
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Ohio, Jason Mize, Jerome Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Hamilton County Ohio et al
as 1:2009cv00704
Plaintiff:
Nathan May
Defendant:
Hamilton County Ohio, Kevin Scholz and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Everhart et al v. TM Claims Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
Steve Everhart and Terri Everhart
Defendant:
TM Claims Service, Inc., GS Battery (U.S.A.) Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sayler v. Gilbert et al
as 2:2008cv00516
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sayler and Kevin Sayler
Defendant:
Jeremy D Gilbert, Columbus Division of Police, City of Columbus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tice v. Erwin et al
as 2:2008cv00436
Plaintiff:
Misty Ann Tice and Misty Ann Tice
Defendant:
James Erwin, John and/or Jane Does 1-5 and John and/or Jane Does 6-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mill's Pride L.P. v. Miller Salvage, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00990
Plaintiff:
Mill's Pride L.P., Mill's Pride L.P. and Mill's Pride L.P.
Defendant:
Miller Salvage, Inc., Miller Lumber Company, W.D. Miller Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
