Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Peterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01407
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Susan Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00751
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christine Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson-Sadler et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rubbin E Sadler and Maun-Yan Peterson-Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04382
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: MARGIE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. USA
as 2:2019cv03086
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jamil Adamu Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Onuachi v. Master Builders, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00358
Defendant: Timmermier, Gross & Prentiss, Harry S. Peterson Company, Alliance Group Inc and others
Plaintiff: Uju Onuachi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01787
Plaintiff: Pete Peterson and Cindy Peterson
Defendant: Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00176
Defendant: Todd Portune, Commissioner, Cooley Turner, Chris Monzel and others
Plaintiff: Tyrone Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson-Woods v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00073
Defendant: Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sheneen Peterson-Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pointer v. Morh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00653
Defendant: Ms. Workman, Mr. Heard, Mr. Emmens and others
Plaintiff: Dennis Wayne Pointer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?