Cases 31 - 40 of 513
Redman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Paul Redman, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00037
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Timothy Erin Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitaker et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Darrell Whitaker, Sr. and Elizabeth Whitaker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chamberlin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chamberlin, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
William B. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garza, Sr. v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04036
Plaintiff:
Brian Garza, Sr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hairston v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03996
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rickey Hairston and Rickey Hairston, Sr.
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelms v. Madison et al
as 2:2023cv03663
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Nelms, Sr.
Defendant:
Director James Madison, Luci, Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
