Cases 41 - 50 of 247
Cook v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01949
Plaintiff:
JAMES A COOK
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cook v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01723
Plaintiff:
DIANA HARRIET COOK
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Richard Cook
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Paul Cook
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Tornichio et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Pierre Rahsaan Taylor
Defendant:
Adolfo Tornichio, Stephen Wolaver, Alan Kraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fulmer v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
David Fulmer
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sprunger v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv05836
Plaintiff:
Melonie L. Sprunger
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kilburn et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05802
Plaintiff:
George Kilburn and Jessica Cook
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
Marcia Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hutchinson v. Nuzum et al
as 2:2021cv05616
Plaintiff:
Courtney C. Hutchinson
Defendant:
Trey Nuzum, Sergeant Rose, Lieutenant Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
