Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Estate of Martie Clark et al v. Sickman et al
as 1:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sickman , Linda Clark , Mark Forrester and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County of, Greg Hartmann, Chris Monzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckert v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00850
Plaintiff:
Linda S Eckert
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and John/Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz-Bueno, III et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02548
Plaintiff:
John C Ruiz-Bueno, III and Michael Gay
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Maria Sylvestri, Mary Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zuelsdorf et al v. Jefferson County, Ohio et al
as 2:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Amy Zuelsdorf and Bobbi Jo Cook
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Ohio, Fred Abdalla, Tod Hagins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 2:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Maria Bowen
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company , Starbucks , ABC LLC or Corp 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Davita et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Phillips
Defendant:
Davita , John or Jane Does 1-10 and John Doe Corporations 11-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Allen et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Precious Allen and Dawn Brunner
Defendant:
Jay Clark, Kasey Eaves, Sharon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
