Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Subramanya v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2020cv03707
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ken Cuccinelli and Ernest Destefano
Plaintiff:
Ranjitha Subramanya, Kebin Palma Sanchez, Lucrecia Rosa Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Rodriguez v. Bard et al
as 1:2020cv00551
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00262
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Efrain Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02976
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Special Master:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez Chaves et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02160
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hock and Luis Rodriguez Chaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02064
Plaintiff:
Roberto T Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
League of Women Voters of Ohio et al v. LaRose
as 2:2020cv01638
Plaintiff:
Audrianna Victorian Rodriguez, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Hannah Tuvall and others
Defendant:
Frank LaRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01325
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jaris Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00803
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019cv05298
Plaintiff:
Oscar Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
