Cases 1 - 10 of 2,465
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03174
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03175
Plaintiff:
Nicole Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dowdy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03134
Plaintiff:
William R Dowdy, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Jalen Bradley and Ja-Dawn Bradley
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, The City of Columbus Division of Police, Carl Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaidosh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02971
Plaintiff:
William Gaidosh
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02964
Plaintiff:
William Evans
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
William Marshall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mabry et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
William Mabry and Joyce Mabry
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lightner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
William Lightner, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
