Cases 1 - 10 of 725
Reddick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02549
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reddick
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ekeh v. Rambanapas et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ekeh
Defendant:
Elvis Rambanapas, Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP, Mallory Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hebert v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01997
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hebert
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sagers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sagers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor et al v. Hooven et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Brendon Taylor and Holly Hooven
Defendant:
Jesse Lee Anthony Hooven, City Of Cincinnati, Madison M Paul and others
Finacchiaro v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01653
Plaintiff:
Anthony Finacchiaro
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Faga v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01621
Plaintiff:
Anthony Faga
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks v. Geodis Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Michael Banks
Defendant:
Geodis Logistics, LLC, Anthony Sweeney, Ryan Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Degliomini v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
Anthony Degliomini
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carrillo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01428
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
