Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Ash v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ash v. Phillips et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ash
Defendant:
Robert Phillips, III, Dustin Hardway, Kevin Fairfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ash v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04261
Plaintiff:
Travanon Ash
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Blue Ash Auto Body, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv00393
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Blue Ash Auto Body, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heid et al v. Aderholt et al
as 2:2020cv00901
Defendant:
Mrs. Wright, Mr./Mrs. Rosengarten, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Boards of Trustees of The Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Ash Management Services, LLC
as 2:2019cv05388
Defendant:
Ash Management Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of The Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Blare-Ashe v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04299
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Blare-Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
