Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Smith v. Schwarck et al
as 2:2024cv03344
Plaintiff:
Daryl Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Jason Schwarck, Police Officer Hunter Sylvis and Red Roof Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hunter v. Village of Ripley
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Owen Hunter
Defendant:
Village of Ripley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Dawn Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David Hunter, Magistrate Margaret Clark, Judge Brett Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Osmanski v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02846
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter Osmanski
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hunter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
Nivia Hunter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hunter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02440
Plaintiff:
Christian H. Hunter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. Tekulve et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimica D Phelps
Defendant:
Mark J Tekulve, Barbara Wiedenbein, Zach Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04192
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chappel v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Chappel
Defendant:
Magistrate David M Hunter, Tyler Cantrell, Mackenzie Carrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
