Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Mathis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02279
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mathis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01638
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Mathis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis-Ross v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02215
Plaintiff:
Latarsha Mathis-Ross
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. CR Bard, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Dalton Mathis
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04968
Plaintiff:
Felicia Mathis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03723
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
The P&G Health & Longterm Disability Plan v. Mathis
as 1:2019cv00478
Plaintiff:
The P&G Health & Longterm Disability Plan, fka The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plans and The P&G Health & Longterm Disability Plan
Defendant:
Tracy Mathis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
