Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Norton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
Deanna Norton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03823
Plaintiff:
William Norton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hartshorn Kennett et al v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv03771
Defendant:
Elaine Hartshorn Kennett, Ricky Kennett, Elizabeth M Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine M. Hartshorn Kennett and Ricky A. Kennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer
Norton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05372
Plaintiff:
Janis Norton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04886
Plaintiff:
Manuel Norton
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv05605
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Philip Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03580
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ruby Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Village of St. Bernard et al
as 1:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Board of Zoning Appeals, Village of St. Bernard, Gerald L Stoker and Village of St. Bernard
Plaintiff:
Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00827
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Norton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shipp et al v. Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Shipp and Cynthia A. Shipp
Defendant:
LAL Properties, LLC, Flora Byrnes, Leesman Lighting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
