Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shreve v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Terry Shreve
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shreve v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05554
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shreve
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker-Shreve v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00751
Plaintiff:
Penny Tucker-Shreve
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shreve v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03141
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Shreve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shreves v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Scott Douglas Shreves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damron v. Shreve et al
as 2:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Linda Damron
Defendant:
Todd Shreve, Logan County Sheriff's Department, Logan County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreves et al v. M.A. Souders,Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00966
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Shreves and Shawn P Halter
Defendant:
M.A. Souders,Inc. , Turf Services and Michael A Souders
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Worley et al v. Franklin County, Ohio et al
as 2:2011cv00415
Plaintiff:
Michael Worley , Robert Shreve and Frankie Mosley
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ohio, Jim Karnes, Mark Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shreve et al v. Franklin County Ohio et al
as 2:2010cv00644
Plaintiff:
Robert Shreve , Michael Reed and Dawn Fiore-Bruno
Defendant:
Franklin County Ohio, Sheriff Franklin County, Mark Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry et al v. Waste Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00410
Defendant:
Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry, Jaron Paima, Frederick Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
