Cases 1 - 10 of 513
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Manns et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer T Manns, Officer Halib Kahn, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryhter et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Shelli Ryhter and Jerry Ryhter, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lightner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
William Lightner, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ballantyne Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
James Ballantyne Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02693
Plaintiff:
Robert Romo, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasiloff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02712
Plaintiff:
Sr. George Vasiloff
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02711
Plaintiff:
Desi Dwayne Turner, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vera, Sr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02672
Plaintiff:
Jorge Vera, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
