Cases 1 - 10 of 963
Gudmundsen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02729
Plaintiff:
Scott Gudmundsen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. Polpropylene Hernia Mesh Product Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gower v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
Scott Gower
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02395
Plaintiff:
Brady Scott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02418
Plaintiff:
Martin Scott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Szczepanek v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Scott L. Szczepanek
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kaplan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Kaplan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoseth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Scott Arthur Hoseth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mensen v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Scott Mensen
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
