Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Vazquez v. Tomorrow Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Michael Vazquez
Defendant:
Tomorrow Energy Corp., TI Sales Group, LLC, Paul Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Knight et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
William Knight, Eric Smith, Mark Coleman and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vazquez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02776
Plaintiff:
Julie E. Vazquez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vazquez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05382
Plaintiff:
Maria Vazquez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv03241
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Judith Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04884
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maribel Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03874
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez, Jr. et al v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2020cv01551
Defendant:
The Ohio State University
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Tito Vazquez, Jr., John Thomas MacDonald, Jr. and John Does 1 - 8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vazquez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00263
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
OSCAR VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bremar v. Ohio University et al
as 2:2019cv05002
Defendant:
Cheryl Geng, Randy Leite, Ohio University and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bremar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
