Cases 121 - 130 of 1,458
Rahhal v. The East Central Electric Co. et al
as 6:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
The East Central Electric Co., Jim Smith and Gary Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
White et al v. Matthews et al
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Brandy White, TW, KW and others
Defendant:
Scott Matthews, Greater Muskogee Community Foundation and Muskogee Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Lawrence v. Poteau, City of et al
as 6:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Lyle Lawrence
Defendant:
Poteau, City of and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Headding et al
as 6:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Casey Carroll
Defendant:
Blythe Headding and City of Marietta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rahhal v. Liquor Store Owner Highway 48
as 6:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
Liquor Store Owner Highway 48 and Liquor Store Owner-Highway 48
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities
Massey v. Blinken
as 6:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Joe Alan Massey and Joe-Alan
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
