Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Earls et al v. Arkoma, Town of et al
as 6:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Amy Leigh Earls
Defendant:
Arkoma, Town of , Thomas Gage , Daniel New and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison et al v. Williams et al
as 6:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
William Harrison, Jr. and Jeannette Harrison Murby
Defendant:
Jackie Williams, Kim Johnson, Dustin Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Hendrix et al
as 6:2016cv00313
Defendant:
Larry Hendrix, John Doe and Terry Park
Plaintiff:
Newton Cook, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grizzle v. Christian et al
as 6:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kim Grizzle and Twila Grizzle
Defendant:
John Christian , Pontotoc County Board of County Commissioners , Arnold Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Fowlin et al
as 6:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Willoman C. Brown, Sr
Defendant:
Mary Fowlin, Thomas Alford, Emily LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rule v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rule
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nipp v. Russell et al
as 6:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Nipp
Defendant:
Joe Russell , Oklahoma Department of Public Safety and Johnny Denney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. McCurtain County Jail Trust et al
as 6:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Veda Carter
Defendant:
McCurtain County Jail Trust , McCurtain County Board of County Commissioners , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Norris v. Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 6:2015cv00356
Plaintiff:
Douglas Norris
Defendant:
Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority, Shiloh Hall, Morris, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
