Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Shaik v. Melton et al
as 6:2024cv00252
Defendant:
Rebecca Johnson, Darin Rogers, Ben Flowers and others
Plaintiff:
Zak Shaik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yukich et al v. Gentner Drummond et al
as 6:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Philip Yukich, III, Janel Renee Stewart and Janel Renee Stewart-Yukich
Defendant:
Attorney General of Oklahoma, Kenny Rogers, Robert Fagnant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Phillips v. Petty et al
as 6:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Jesse Petty, Jesse James, Jason Null and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marlatt v. Murray County Jail et al
as 6:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Marlatt
Defendant:
Murray County Jail, Murray County Board of County Commissioners, Darin Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phillips v Rogers
as 6:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Charlie Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontenot v. Ada, City of et al
as 6:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Karl Fontenot
Defendant:
Ada, City of, Mike Baskin, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Michael Wiles, Fernando Cardenas, State of Oklahoma, The and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Coweta, City of et al
as 6:2018cv00285
Defendant:
Roger Kolman, Evette Morris, Coweta, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Doug Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
