Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Anderson v. Quick
as 6:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Byron Anderson
Counter Defendant:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wright
Respondent:
Gentre Drummond and Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
St. Clair v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Michael St. Clair
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lay v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00318
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Ray
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neasbitt v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Russell E. Neasbitt
Respondent:
Christie Quick, Greg Breslin and Wallace Coppedge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meza v. Quick et al
as 6:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Miguel Meza
Defendant:
Christey Quick, Terri Apala and James Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McCurdy et al
as 6:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Marylin Monae Porter and Lamone M Johnson
Respondent:
Joel McCurdy, Utilizaton Review Committee, Kim Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Perez Escalona et al
as 6:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Defendant:
Juan Alberto Perez Escalona and Quick X Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
