Cases 1 - 10 of 2,506
Harjo v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00282
Petitioner:
Richard Harjo
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stacey v. Kellough et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Oren Stacey
Defendant:
William Kellough and Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downey v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Johnie D Downey
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cozart v. Tulsa County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Delmond Cornell Cozart
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff Office, Vic Regalado, Detention Officer Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethel v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Terrico Bethel
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowbotham v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Roger D Rowbotham
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent:
Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stripling v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Stripling
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell and Smiley Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
