Cases 11 - 20 of 206
Webster et al v. Durbin et al
as 4:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Shirley Dione Webster, Paul Leroy Wickham and Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Dick Durbin, John Roberts, Anita M Josey-Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Carter v. Inhofe et al
as 4:2022cv00474
Defendant:
John Stitt, James M Inhofe, James Lankford and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fortney v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00277
Defendant:
MCR Investors, LLC also known as MCR Hotels doing business as Hampton Inn of Bixby / South Tulsa, John Doe, Todd Blish and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fortney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sjodin v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Kirk Ardell Sjodin, Jr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Judge Pickerill, Cleveland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Bowling, et al
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Charla White
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Creek, Bret Bowling, Turn Key Health Clinics, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Saldivar v. Trump
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Salbador Alejandro Saldivar
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.