Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Harris v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, John Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Carter v. Hoskins et al
as 4:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Defendant:
Chuck Hoskins, Jr, Bryan Warner, Sam Hider Health Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fowler et al v. Stitt et al
as 4:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Rowan Fowler, Allister Hall, C.R. and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Keith Reed and Kelly Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dodson v. County Commissioners of Mayes County et al
as 4:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Natasha Dodson
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Mayes County , Mike Reed , Gary Shrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00606
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Wilkins
Defendant:
Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc., Oklahoma Sheriffs'Association, The, Jason Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dodson v. County Commissioners of Mayes County et al
as 4:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
Natasha Dodson
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Mayes County , Mike Reed , Gary Shrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2015cv00528
Plaintiff:
Michelle Dawn Murphy
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, Mike Cook, Timothy Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
