Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00348
Petitioner:
Anthony B Henson, Sr
Respondent:
Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes and Salinda Eve Hayes
Defendant:
Jon Copeland, Michael Kitchens, Kristen Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knighten v. Tulsa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Herndon Knighten, Herndon DeWayne Barnes and Herndon DeWayne Jones
Defendant:
B Byrd, Tulsa County Sheriff Department, Aaron Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Matthew Willis, Sarah Kessler, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Armah v. Dowling
as 4:2021cv00011
Petitioner:
Francis B Armah
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 4:2020cv00424
Defendant:
David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2018cv00671
Defendant:
David B Parker, Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County and Vic Regalado
Plaintiff:
James Michael Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luginbyhl v. Klahr et al
as 4:2015cv00517
Defendant:
Tony Klahr, Mark H Harper, Jack P Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luginbyhl v. Glanz, et al
as 4:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Richard Weigel, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
